METHODS: Through press release, radio, and newspaper advertisements, we targeted persons exposed to gold mining or processing. We surveyed a convenience sample to assess risk factors. We analyzed urine to determine creatinine-normalized mercury levels, using a literature-derived reference (20 µg/g creatinine) to assess potential health risk.
RESULTS: Of 40–50 people approached, 18 participants completed surveys and submitted urine. Seventeen (94%) were male; 14 (78%) were miners. No miner heated gold ≥15 minutes/week. Participants’ urine mercury levels ranged from 0.2 to 106.1 µg/g (median: 0.9 µg/g). Subject A, the only participant whose urine mercury concentration exceeded the health-risk level, was a processor who heated gold inside his home 2–3 hours/day. His two neighbors — nonminers concerned about frequent unpleasant fumes from subject A’s home — had the next highest levels (6.4 and 5.4 µg/g). Subject A denied symptoms, and his urine mercury level decreased to 50 µg/g after the summer gold-processing season ended. Safe practice recommendations were distributed to miners and posted throughout Nome.
CONCLUSIONS: Subject A was exposed to potentially toxic mercury levels while heat-processing gold indoors. His neighbors were likely exposed through fumes released from his home. Artisanal miners and processors need education about safe purification practices to limit personal and community exposure.