METHODS: An internal review of all HP2020 objectives was conducted by topic area, and complemented by meetings with key internal and external stakeholders to elicit feedback on such topics as indicator definition and priority level of the indicator based on program needs/goals. Simultaneously, the HHDW website was redesigned to align with HP2020 topic areas, and internal/external stakeholder input was obtained on the new website design. A collaborative HP2020 webpage was built on the HHDW website that reflected the needs and input of health programs in Hawaii, and indicators were added in order of programmatic priority.
RESULTS: During Year 1, 1,202 (100%) unique HP2020 objectives underwent internal review, and were parsed into those with existing indicators, those for which exact or proxy indicators could be built, and those for which no known state-level data sources existed. 900 (74.9%) objectives were additionally reviewed in 32 meetings with multiple stakeholders. A total of 106 existing indicators, and 164 high priority indicators to be built were identified. The HHDW website was realigned with HP2020 topic areas. Input from program partners was sought during all key decision points. During Year 2, 149 new indicators were added, and follow-up activities on multiple indicators on hold are underway.
CONCLUSIONS: The critical benefit that the HP2020 transition project offered was an opportunity to educate programs on HP2020 and engage internal and external stakeholders. This process enhanced departmental visibility and attention to HP2020, and encouraged a mutually beneficial process of tailoring programmatic goals and the HHDW to HP2020 and to one another. The process also improved the familiarity, utilization, and dissemination of HHDW resources among stakeholders in Hawaii.