Tuberculosis Transmission in a Hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Unit — North Carolina, 2016

Wednesday, June 7, 2017: 10:30 AM
400C, Boise Centre
Jessica Rinsky , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Raleigh, NC
Jessica Dixon , WakeMed Health & Hospitals, Raleigh, NC
Jason Stout , Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
Amina Ahmed , Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC
Thomas E. Young , WakeMed Health & Hospitals, Raleigh, NC
Jean-Marie Maillard , North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Raleigh, NC
Aaron Fleischauer , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Raleigh, NC
Shilpa Bhardwaj , North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Raleigh, NC
Jennifer K MacFarquhar , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Zack Moore , North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Raleigh, NC
BACKGROUND: In November 2016, the North Carolina Division of Public Health was notified of six hospital healthcare personnel (HCP) who developed newly positive tuberculin skin tests (TSTs). All newly positive HCP had cared for an infant who was treated in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) for 17 days after delivery and required respiratory support, including high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV). The infant was posthumously diagnosed with congenital tuberculosis following growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (pan-sensitive) from the mother’s respiratory specimen one month after delivery. No HCP contacts of the mother developed new positive TSTs. We investigated to identify and evaluate the infant’s contacts for tuberculosis infection and provide recommendations.

METHODS:  We defined contacts as HCP, infants, and visitors who spent time in the same NICU room while the patient was present. HCP were screened using TSTs. Infants were screened for tuberculosis infection with clinical assessments, TSTs, and interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs). Because screening tests are unreliable in infants, we recommended preemptive latent tuberculosis treatment (9 months of isoniazid) and monitoring for all exposed infants. Family members were offered IGRA testing.

RESULTS: Among 134 HCP identified as contacts, 130 (97%) were evaluated. In total, 7 HCP (5%) had a new positive TST. All had performed procedures that are high-risk for exposure (e.g., stabilization, intubation, suctioning); none had prolonged exposure to the infant’s mother. Of 26 infant contacts, 22 were screened; none had a positive screening test. Eighteen infants began isoniazid therapy; four additional infants are under monitoring only. Of 23 visitors tested, one had a positive IGRA; this individual had no other risk factors for tuberculosis infection and reported spending >20 hours with her infant immediately adjacent to the index patient. All adults with a positive screening test began latent tuberculosis treatment.

CONCLUSIONS:  Evidence suggests that transmission of tuberculosis, likely from a congenitally-infected infant, to HCP and one visitor occurred in a NICU. While thought to be rare, M. tuberculosis transmission from congenitally-infected infants to HCP has been reported. Respiratory support of the infected infant, including aerosol-generating procedures and HFOV, might have contributed to this unusual transmission event. These findings reinforce the importance of following current tuberculosis contact investigation guidance to evaluate all persons, including visitors, who share airspace with an infectious tuberculosis patient for a prolonged period or during aerosol-generating procedures.